There are many instances where criminal and civil cases can overlap. A single violent act can render the perpetrator criminally responsible and liable in a personal injury suit.
One of the most famous criminal and civil liability instances involves the OJ Simpson murder case. OJ Simpson was brought up on charges for allegedly murdering his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and Ron Goldman. After a not guilty verdict in criminal court, the families of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman filed a wrongful death suit in civil court.
OJ Simpson was found liable for the deaths of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman. A jury awarded the victims’ families $33.5 million, including punitive damages.
While criminal and civil claims can result from the same act, there are substantial differences. Criminal law involves cases where there is a potential danger to the public. Civil law applies to private disputes.
In a criminal case:
In a civil case;
Not every act of wrongdoing will provide a reason for a criminal and civil case. However, It is essential to know your rights if you wish to pursue a civil lawsuit.
Recently, Las Vegas has been rocked by a horrific and tragic car crash that took the lives of nine people. Among the fatalities, all six children from a single family were killed.
The children of Erlinda Zacarías and Jesús Mejía ranged in age from five years old to 25 years old. The 7th victim was Zacarías’ brother, Jose Zacarías-Caldera, age 35:
According to local news, Gary Dean Robinson drove his Dodge Challenger through a red light at more than 100 mph, striking several vehicles. He and his passenger were also killed.
As Las Vegas mourns this unfathomable tragedy, a memorial is being set up at the crash site to honor the victims. The Mejía-Zacaría family has set up a GoFundMe page to help pay for their children’s and brother’s funerals.
Robinson committed an act so heinous that had he lived, Robinson would have faced charges in criminal and civil court.
Court records have shown that Robinson had committed several felonies and other crimes going back to 1989. In the days before the deadly crash, Robinson pleaded guilty to speeding 10 miles over the limit and paid a $150 fine.
A plaintiff may still pursue civil charges when criminal charges are dropped.
Recently, manslaughter charges were dropped in a fatal motorway accident. While the accident occurred in England, the criminal and civil law system works similarly enough to our legal system for the purpose of the example.
National Highways, formerly known as Highways England, was initially brought up on corporate manslaughter charges in the deaths of Nargis Begum, 62, and Jason Mercer and Alexandru Murgeanu, aged 44 and 22.
There was no hard shoulder for the couple to safely pull off when their car broke down in South Yorkshire. As Nargis Begum waited for help on the side, another car crashed into the stopped vehicle and mowed the “grandmother of nine” down.
Despite multiple deaths and many more injuries caused by the lack of a hard shoulder, a technicality in the law is forcing the corporate manslaughter charges to be dropped.
Families of the victims will continue their fight in civil court.
When charges are dropped, plaintiffs may still pursue justice in civil court. In criminal law, it must be proven that the defendant committed the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. In civil law, a plaintiff must prove that the defendant was negligent, and the negligent act directly caused their injuries.
In the midst of understanding the intricacies of legal procedures, it’s essential to recognize the evolving nature of evidence and regulations. For instance, the increasing use of dashcam footage has become a pivotal element in many cases, shedding light on incidents from an unbiased perspective.
Additionally, staying updated with the latest changes in Nevada’s driving laws can be crucial for both plaintiffs and defendants, ensuring they are well-prepared for any legal challenges.
Due to the different standards of proof, a plaintiff may win a civil suit if the criminal charges are dropped. If the defendant pleads guilty or is found guilty, the verdict can help support a personal injury claim.
If the defendant pleads no contest, it is important to know the difference. Pleading guilty is admitting guilt for the criminal act. However, pleading no contest means the defendant acknowledges and admits the facts of the charge are true but will not admit guilt.
The distinction is crucial to a personal injury suit. If the defendant enters a guilty plea, it can support the civil case. A plea of no contest cannot be used in civil court.
When you have concerns about a criminal case’s effects on a personal injury claim, consult with an experienced attorney from Gina Corena & Associates.
As founder of Gina Corena & Associates, she is dedicated to fighting for the rights of the people who suffer life-changing personal injuries in car, truck and motorcycle accidents as well as other types of personal injury. Gina feels fortunate to serve the Nevada community and hold wrongdoers accountable for their harm to her clients.